Review: In The Eye of Heaven by David Keck
I bought the mmpb version of In the Eye of Heaven by David Keck last year, but held off on reading it do to the mixed reaction i read on the internet. For some reason, I decided to give it a go over the Memorial Day holiday, and boy am I glad I did.
First off, I totally understand why this book is polarizing. His writing style is something you will either love or hate. Me, I LOVED it. This isn't a case where you will see me say "read the first 100 pages to before forming an opinion". For this book, all you need to do is read the first chapter, which is 10 pages long in the mmpb. At that point, if you like what you read, you will enjoy the rest. If you found the language too hard to read, or stilted, or otherwise unappealing, you aren't going to be interested in the rest. This book is pretty unique in that regard. You really have to enjoy the author's writing style to enjoy the book. Like I mentioned above, I loved it, and took to it immediately. By the end of Chapter 1, I knew I was going to read this book til the end. The best way I can think of to describe the author's style is cinematic, but without being too wordy. In fact, many of the sentences are short, and almost choppy. But with the way Keck uses words, this shorter, sometimes abrupt sentence structure works. For me, the writing was very visual, and he does a great job of conveying sounds, too (and not in the Modesitt way of using "WHACK" or "frrrp" or things of the sort). I found myself reading the book as much for the wording as for the story. There are even moments of humor, which were due more to the choice of words the author used, then to the situation being described.
So, while the writing was great for me, the story was almost as good, but not quite. The writing style worked better for describing the current scene, than it did when trying to fill in history and back story. Quite often I found myself struggling to understand the implications of some portions of the story, and the characters often understood things before I did. My other nit pick was that Durand was in a situation to be the hero a little too often. On the plus side for the story, i loved the characters and characterization. And I thought he did a great job with the dialogue among the knights. I really felt "this is how knights would talk to (and treat) each other". Much of the story is spent watching Durand and his band fight in Knightly tournaments, which was a nice change of pace.
All this being said, I would rate this book as one of my favorite reads of 2009, and I wish I had read it sooner. I plan to find a hardcover copy for my collection, as I see myself wanting to read this one again in the future. As for my recommendation, if you click the Amazon widget (which you Google Reader folks probably can't see) or the link in the book title at the top of the post, you can visit the Amazon page for this book. The reason I recommend that here is that Amazon has a "look inside" feature for this book, and you can read the first 5 pages of chapter 1. And quite honestly, my review can be boiled down to this: if those 5 sample pages work for you, get this book right away. If they don't, go ahead and mark this one off your list. If the writing style does work for you, I think you will really enjoy In The Eye of Heaven.
June 4th, 2009 - 16:54
Great review. I appreciate your approach to the material .AND. your wisdom to know that all books aren't for all people.
I'll be back.
June 4th, 2009 - 17:13
Thanks, Pam! And I'm glad to hear you will visit again
June 4th, 2009 - 20:00
Saw the excerpt and I agree with your assessment (and I liked it so I got both books, and will read next, or next next so by the weekend, early next week I should be done)
June 5th, 2009 - 08:56
Another book where we're polar opposites, Jeff. First Tom Lloyd now this one.
June 5th, 2009 - 09:03
Clicked published rather than preview….
Not that disagreeing is bad, but interesting to see where our reading tastes coincide (Sturges & Weeks) and where they differ (Lloyd, Keck & Brett).
June 5th, 2009 - 09:23
Liviu: Looking forward to your take on this one to see which side of the fence you will fall on (love/hate).
Rob: You know, maybe its just me, but I see quite a few similarities in the writing styles of Keck and Lloyd (i meant to mention it in the review). I would bet that has a strong connection to why I liked both of those authors, and you didnt so much. And I still think my reaction to Brett was weird. I'm gonna let the book site awhile, then revisit it later in the fall.
June 5th, 2009 - 11:40
I think it's very likely I will love it; I may read first Library of Shadows now that i finished Consorts of Heaven (though today I plan to re-read that first), so I may get to it only Sunday or Monday but it reads very well for me; love the style
I may even give Stormcaller another try as the next epic after this one in a week or two, though Keck reads better for me at least in the first 30 odd pages
June 5th, 2009 - 11:43
Wanted to add that indeed David Keck and Tom Llyod read very similar, agree with that, just that Keck appeals to me more now for some reason (naming conventions or other stuff like that)
Regarding Brett, hard to say but it is different than the rest quoted here so it may just be a style not on your taste thingy – cannot think of a quick comparison, but it is definitely not Weeks or Keck/Lloyd
June 5th, 2009 - 14:39
Liviu: re: Brett, I'm not sure that it was a style thing with him (for me). I think i just didnt connect with the story. I would definitely give Lloyd another go if you can make yourself do so, the writing really improves as you go, and the second book was great.
Funny thing: last night when I picked up The Tyranny of the Night by Glen Cook, i felt his writing, at least in that story, was similar to Lloyd and Keck.
June 5th, 2009 - 15:49
Agree with Tyranny too – never read anything by Glen Cook before (tried but not for me) but the setup of that one intrigued me and I liked it once I got used with the clipped prose. Volume 2 is even better though it is also slightly more predictable, but I am on board for volume 3 whenever…
Definitely want to try Lloyd again – it's a matter of when not if, maybe in about 6/8 books so in like 2 weeks
June 13th, 2009 - 13:21
Great review! Like you I read different things about it. Most important hint for me is that this is a love or hate book and that it takes only the first chapter to make a decision. Instead of following your advice to look at amazon for the excerpt I used google to find this this excerpt from publisher Macmillan. And of course I read it.I must admit I liked what I read. Now I have one more book for my list. Thank you.